<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Promote Your Game With Software Submissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/06/21/promote-your-game-with-software-submissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/06/21/promote-your-game-with-software-submissions/</link>
	<description>I&#039;m baking games. Indie style.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:37:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Paulson</title>
		<link>http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/06/21/promote-your-game-with-software-submissions/comment-page-1/#comment-4548</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Paulson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/06/21/promote-your-game-with-software-submissions/#comment-4548</guid>
		<description>It should be noted that Rudenko&#039;s submission service lists over 800 sites while Glimmer Games has approximately half of that. I haven&#039;t used either service so I can&#039;t comment on them further.

One other little hit, for people releasing their first game, it might be a good idea to have a service do it.  They have experience putting things together and you could learn a lot by watching what they do.  Then you&#039;d be in a better position to decide if you want to handle updates and other games yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be noted that Rudenko&#8217;s submission service lists over 800 sites while Glimmer Games has approximately half of that. I haven&#8217;t used either service so I can&#8217;t comment on them further.</p>
<p>One other little hit, for people releasing their first game, it might be a good idea to have a service do it.  They have experience putting things together and you could learn a lot by watching what they do.  Then you&#8217;d be in a better position to decide if you want to handle updates and other games yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juuso Hietalahti</title>
		<link>http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/06/21/promote-your-game-with-software-submissions/comment-page-1/#comment-4500</link>
		<dc:creator>Juuso Hietalahti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 07:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/06/21/promote-your-game-with-software-submissions/#comment-4500</guid>
		<description>@Twist: Good point. I admit I&#039;m looking this information from PC point-of-view. Thanks for the tip. Mac users should also concentrate on getting in front page of Apple.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Twist: Good point. I admit I&#8217;m looking this information from PC point-of-view. Thanks for the tip. Mac users should also concentrate on getting in front page of Apple.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twist</title>
		<link>http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/06/21/promote-your-game-with-software-submissions/comment-page-1/#comment-4498</link>
		<dc:creator>Twist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 07:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/06/21/promote-your-game-with-software-submissions/#comment-4498</guid>
		<description>Download.com is a good site but if you are releasing a Mac only game or a game with a Mac version then you will want to submit your game to VersionTracker.com as well since this site is much more popular among Mac users than Download.com. VersionTracker.com also has sections for Windows and Palm software but to my knowledge the Mac side is where most of the hits come from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Download.com is a good site but if you are releasing a Mac only game or a game with a Mac version then you will want to submit your game to VersionTracker.com as well since this site is much more popular among Mac users than Download.com. VersionTracker.com also has sections for Windows and Palm software but to my knowledge the Mac side is where most of the hits come from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~Kuneri Bloggy &#187; Promoting your software</title>
		<link>http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/06/21/promote-your-game-with-software-submissions/comment-page-1/#comment-4488</link>
		<dc:creator>~Kuneri Bloggy &#187; Promoting your software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/06/21/promote-your-game-with-software-submissions/#comment-4488</guid>
		<description>[...] Nice tips from Juuso about promoting your game with software submissions. There are practical information about software submission tools and services. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nice tips from Juuso about promoting your game with software submissions. There are practical information about software submission tools and services. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ville</title>
		<link>http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/06/21/promote-your-game-with-software-submissions/comment-page-1/#comment-4482</link>
		<dc:creator>Ville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 05:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/06/21/promote-your-game-with-software-submissions/#comment-4482</guid>
		<description>Years ago you did get relatively much publicity just by being visible on download sites. These days they are very crowded, and people generally download straight from the source. 

If you rely on download site publicity, then you should consider those paid programs that get you more visibility. Some are really just a waste of money (time on top of the list until someone else buys the same package), but a good model is to pay for downloads or even buy button clicks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Years ago you did get relatively much publicity just by being visible on download sites. These days they are very crowded, and people generally download straight from the source. </p>
<p>If you rely on download site publicity, then you should consider those paid programs that get you more visibility. Some are really just a waste of money (time on top of the list until someone else buys the same package), but a good model is to pay for downloads or even buy button clicks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

