<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GameProducer.NET Website Version 4.0 is Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/</link>
	<description>I bake games. Indie style.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juuso Hietalahti</title>
		<link>http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-10386</link>
		<dc:creator>Juuso Hietalahti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 11:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/#comment-10386</guid>
		<description>@killarkai: Bear in mind... that people outside the developed countries can still put their game online and sell it to North America &amp; Europe using $20 price tag... That means less than 3 sold copies to get your money back. 

And with the Insider&#039;s Guide - you are sure to see those sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@killarkai: Bear in mind&#8230; that people outside the developed countries can still put their game online and sell it to North America &#038; Europe using $20 price tag&#8230; That means less than 3 sold copies to get your money back. </p>
<p>And with the Insider&#8217;s Guide &#8211; you are sure to see those sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: killarkai</title>
		<link>http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-9444</link>
		<dc:creator>killarkai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 06:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/#comment-9444</guid>
		<description>&quot;This fee is small enough for serious game developers to pay, but high enough to keep spammers away from boards.&quot;

$50 is a *hefty* fee for people outside the developed countries.

$50 for a noise filter, that&#039;s not a good enough reason to sign-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This fee is small enough for serious game developers to pay, but high enough to keep spammers away from boards.&#8221;</p>
<p>$50 is a *hefty* fee for people outside the developed countries.</p>
<p>$50 for a noise filter, that&#8217;s not a good enough reason to sign-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juuso Hietalahti</title>
		<link>http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-9435</link>
		<dc:creator>Juuso Hietalahti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 04:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/#comment-9435</guid>
		<description>I also recommend people to join indiegamer.com and gamedev.net, there&#039;s plenty of good discussion there. I would also recommend joining ASP ($100 per year)

The forums is targeted to people who want to skip most of the noise that - unfortunately - some of the major forums have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also recommend people to join indiegamer.com and gamedev.net, there&#8217;s plenty of good discussion there. I would also recommend joining ASP ($100 per year)</p>
<p>The forums is targeted to people who want to skip most of the noise that &#8211; unfortunately &#8211; some of the major forums have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zonque</title>
		<link>http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-9385</link>
		<dc:creator>Zonque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 16:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/#comment-9385</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the hint, LMAO ;)

50 bucks is a joke, Juuso.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the hint, LMAO ;)</p>
<p>50 bucks is a joke, Juuso.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LMAO</title>
		<link>http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-9359</link>
		<dc:creator>LMAO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/#comment-9359</guid>
		<description>$50 to join your forum! Are you having a laugh! I strongly recommend people visit Indiegamer.com, it&#039;s free and it&#039;s not full of affiliate junk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$50 to join your forum! Are you having a laugh! I strongly recommend people visit Indiegamer.com, it&#8217;s free and it&#8217;s not full of affiliate junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Bowman</title>
		<link>http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-9357</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/#comment-9357</guid>
		<description>Looks great, I really like it. You should check it in IE though, I&#039;m seeing everything centre aligned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks great, I really like it. You should check it in IE though, I&#8217;m seeing everything centre aligned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juuso Hietalahti</title>
		<link>http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-9331</link>
		<dc:creator>Juuso Hietalahti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 17:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/#comment-9331</guid>
		<description>@Tobias: yes &quot;recommended money makers&quot; are affiliate referrals - but not all my &quot;recommended...&quot; are affiliates. And they work (some might simply take some time?) - tell me if something is not working (title perhaps?). It&#039;s easier me to track clicks (rather than count on affiliates/others) when I use resource.php instead of direct link - that way I can get statistics about my website clickthroughs. (I would have put Google there as well, but unfortunately Google needs to use Javascript thing... so I cannot put it to my resource database).

I don&#039;t know what you should do for the sake of trust and openness: anybody that knows little bit about affiliates knows that there are affiliate programs with google/amazon and others. I&#039;m suggesting the ones I&#039;ve used &amp; work for me. Previously I used direct links, but now I find it easier for use &amp; track what&#039;s happening as I can get statistical data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tobias: yes &#8220;recommended money makers&#8221; are affiliate referrals &#8211; but not all my &#8220;recommended&#8230;&#8221; are affiliates. And they work (some might simply take some time?) &#8211; tell me if something is not working (title perhaps?). It&#8217;s easier me to track clicks (rather than count on affiliates/others) when I use resource.php instead of direct link &#8211; that way I can get statistics about my website clickthroughs. (I would have put Google there as well, but unfortunately Google needs to use Javascript thing&#8230; so I cannot put it to my resource database).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what you should do for the sake of trust and openness: anybody that knows little bit about affiliates knows that there are affiliate programs with google/amazon and others. I&#8217;m suggesting the ones I&#8217;ve used &#038; work for me. Previously I used direct links, but now I find it easier for use &#038; track what&#8217;s happening as I can get statistical data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobias</title>
		<link>http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/comment-page-1/#comment-9324</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gameproducer.net/2006/08/19/gameproducernet-website-version-40-is-online/#comment-9324</guid>
		<description>Nice update, I like it.

I noticed that the links under &quot;Recommended money makers&quot; are not showing to where they lead. Instead there is &quot;resource.php?id=x&quot; and a redirect. Now, I&#039;ll assume that this is done to hide the fact that you have a referral code (correct me if I am wrong, I apologize in advance) on the links. I just started a website of my own with affiliate links with ugly url&#039;s that look just plain suspicious and was thinking of &quot;hiding&quot; the url&#039;s. I decided against for the sake of trust and openness, but I would very much like to hear your rationale behind your choice. I am still debating which way is the &quot;right&quot; one.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice update, I like it.</p>
<p>I noticed that the links under &#8220;Recommended money makers&#8221; are not showing to where they lead. Instead there is &#8220;resource.php?id=x&#8221; and a redirect. Now, I&#8217;ll assume that this is done to hide the fact that you have a referral code (correct me if I am wrong, I apologize in advance) on the links. I just started a website of my own with affiliate links with ugly url&#8217;s that look just plain suspicious and was thinking of &#8220;hiding&#8221; the url&#8217;s. I decided against for the sake of trust and openness, but I would very much like to hear your rationale behind your choice. I am still debating which way is the &#8220;right&#8221; one.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
